Its seems that everyone is praising the new plan that led to a cut in mortgage interest rates! But is the cut really good news for the millions of homeowners already in trouble....If homeowners are already behind on their mortgages or have deliquent credit card payments then the answer is probably NO! IMHO
I'm not a economics professional nor am criticizing the plan but is it possible that the rate cut will only help those with good credit and will do little or nothing for the millions of Americans already suffering with blemished credit scores because of the mess that the original low rates in 2003-04 started? Is the government starting another cycle which was originally fueled by low rates in the first place?
So in the end, the plan will most likely stimulate home sales and will probably help stabilize the housing market but it will do little or nothing to help those already in trouble and may result in more trouble in a year or two after these new loans close. Are the future unemployment rates not a consideration in this plan? Are those qualifying for the new loans at low rates the future bailout victims of 2010?
Please post your thoughts and let me know what you think about the new plan.
Below is an article authored by Holden Lewis from Bankrate.com
Mortgage rates plunged after the Federal Reserve announced that it would buy up to $500 billion of securitized home loans.
Rates on 30-year, fixed-rate, conforming mortgages fell well below 6 percent after the Fed announced Tuesday morning that it would buy up to a half-trillion dollars' worth of mortgage-backed securities over the next year to year-and-a-half. Bankers and brokers say rates fell as far as 5.25 percent, at least for a while. Last week, the 30-year fixed averaged 6.33 percent in Bankrate's weekly survey.
The rate reduction is exactly what the Fed intended: "This action is being taken to reduce the cost and increase the availability of credit for the purchase of houses, which in turn should support housing markets and foster improved conditions in financial markets more generally," the central bank said in its announcement.
"It's pandemonium around here right now," says Bob Walters, chief economist for Quicken Loans. "This is going to have a major effect on refinancing opportunities and it should absolutely translate into increased home buying."
Walters offers a hypothetical example of a California house that has lost $175,000 in value over the last couple of years. In 2006, a borrower would need a $500,000 mortgage to buy the house; today, a borrower would need $325,000.
Two years ago, the average rate on a 30-year fixed was about 6.5 percent. At that rate, the principal and interest on a half-million-dollar loan was $3,160 a month. Now, if someone borrowed $325,000 at 5.5 percent, the monthly principal and interest would be a more affordable $1,845.
The Fed's action helps not only buyers, but also homeowners with adjustable-rate mortgages who want to refinance into fixed-rate loans.
Government giftThe mortgage and real estate industries look upon the announcement as a gift from Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson.
"Wow," says Jim Sahnger, mortgage broker with Palm Beach Financial Network, in Stuart, Fla. "I don't know who invited Bernanke and Paulson to Thanksgiving, but I'm glad they did! They showed up with the equivalent of a 50-pound bird and all the fixin's today, ready for the table."
He suggests that borrowers apply for loans and lock rates quickly, in case rates rise again or home values continue to fall. Declining home values can endanger owners' ability to refinance. Sahnger advises homebuyers to talk to mortgage brokers or loan officers early in the process, to identify "any issues you need to deal with prior to writing a contract," such as errors on credit reports.
Ryan Kennelly, a mortgage banker for Residential Mortgage Services, Inc., of Bedford, N.H., says the Fed's action is huge, for two reasons. "First, with lending institutions getting the much-needed support of the U.S. government, they (lenders) will ease some of their most restrictive lending rules -- opening the door to more consumers to get loans," he says, adding that more qualified borrowers means more home sales.
Second, Kennelly says, "this news also couldn't be better for current homeowners who want to stay in their homes but can no longer afford the payments due to their adjustable-rate mortgage increasing. By interest rates coming down, combined with lenders easing some of their qualification requirements, more and more homeowners in this situation will be able to refinance."
Dan Green, a mortgage broker for Mobium Mortgage in Cincinnati, calls the Fed's purchase plan "an explicit safety net for lenders, and that should encourage more lending."
The Fed's decision to cut mortgage rates won't help people who can't refinance because they owe more than their houses are worth. And people who already are two or three months' behind on their home loans probably won't get much out of it, either, says Dean Baker, economist for the Center for Economic and Policy Research, a Washington think tank.
Lack of transparencyBaker worries about lack of accountability or transparency: The Fed and the Treasury have not disclosed details about their purchases under the Troubled Asset Relief Program, setting a precedent for secrecy about the Fed's purchases of mortgage debt under the plan announced Tuesday. "We don't know who they're going to be buying bonds from, or how much they'll pay -- or if they'll overpay," Baker says, adding that if the Fed pays a dollar for a security that's worth 20 cents, "that's the same as handing (the seller) 80 cents."
Baker adds: "I think it takes a lot of gall to do something like this."
Green says that there is an element of moral hazard in the Fed's action: In the future, borrowers might expect a bailout from the unintended consequences of this action. Nevertheless, the Fed's buying binge might be the best way out of a dilemma. "On moral hazard, some say it led to the bubble. It may now lead the economy back," Green says, koan-like.
Yields fall, mortgage rates do tooBy buying mortgage-backed securities, the Fed will be taking direct action to reduce mortgage rates. That's because mortgage-backed securities behave like bonds. When bond prices rise, their yields fall. A wonkish detour into the behavior of bonds will illustrate this point.
A bond is an IOU. Let's say you lend someone $100 and the borrower gives you a piece of paper, promising to give you $105 a year from now. That paper is a $100 bond with a 5 percent yield. The yield is equivalent to an interest rate. Now assume that the government stepped in and offered to give the borrower a better deal: $102 now in exchange for $105 a year from now. The bond's yield would be roughly 3 percent. That's how the bond's yield gets lower as the price gets higher.
The Fed says it's going to be that buyer who pays a higher price for the bond, causing the yield to drop. As the yields on mortgage-backed securities fall, consumers generally see mortgage rates fall, too.
By pledging to buy up to $500 billion in mortgage-backed securities over the next 12 to 18 months, the Fed is signaling that it's ready to buy a big share of the conforming mortgages underwritten during that period. That could keep bond yields and mortgage rates down. So far this year, Fannie and Freddie have issued about $857 billion in mortgage-backed securities, and the issuance pace has slowed dramatically in recent months.